RunSmart vs. Syft Analytics: Financial Forecasting & Advisory Compared

RunSmart by Projection Genie and Syft Analytics both help businesses, accounting firms, and financial professionals analyze financial performance and plan for the future.

But they approach the problem differently.

Syft Analytics is a broad financial reporting and analysis platform with strong capabilities in dashboards, visualization, consolidation, budgeting, benchmarking, and configurable financial forecasting.

RunSmart focuses more heavily on automating the underlying financial intelligence, including statistical forecasting, financial health analysis, emerging risk detection, scenario modeling, workforce planning, and portfolio-level monitoring.

For SaaS businesses, RunSmart also combines QuickBooks Online financial data with Stripe subscription intelligence so users can analyze completed historical performance, monitor current subscription activity, and forecast what may happen next.

This comparison examines the differences between RunSmart and Syft Analytics across:

• Financial forecasting
• Financial reporting
• Scenario planning
• SaaS analytics
• Financial health
• Workforce planning
• Consolidation
• Portfolio intelligence
• AI and MCP
• Pricing

The better choice depends largely on whether you want a broad, flexible financial analysis platform or a system designed to automate more of the underlying forecasting and financial interpretation.

Note: RunSmart's MCP integration is coming soon and is not yet generally available. References to MCP capabilities in this article describe planned functionality that will be available in a future release.

RunSmart vs. Syft Analytics at a Glance

The platforms overlap in important areas, but their strongest use cases are different.

Syft Analytics is particularly strong for users who want broad financial reporting, dashboards, visualizations, consolidation, benchmarking, customizable forecasting, and detailed financial analysis.

RunSmart is designed more around automatically analyzing financial performance, establishing a starting forecast, identifying financial health and risk signals, and helping users evaluate what may happen next.

What Is RunSmart by Projection Genie?

RunSmart is a financial intelligence and forecasting platform designed for founders, business owners, accounting firms, advisors, and investors.

RunSmart connects to QuickBooks Online and analyzes historical company financial information.

Its capabilities include:

• Historical financial analysis
• Automated statistical forecasting
• Integrated financial statement forecasts
• Scenario modeling
• Budgeting
• Budget-versus-actual tracking
• Workforce planning
• Financial health analysis
• Emerging financial risk detection
• Automated financial reporting
• Portfolio-level intelligence
• Collaboration and role-based access

For SaaS businesses, RunSmart can also connect Stripe subscription data with QuickBooks Online.

This provides subscription intelligence such as:

• MRR
• ARR
• Active Customers
• New MRR
• Reactivation MRR
• Expansion MRR
• Contraction MRR
• Churned MRR
• Customer Growth
• Customer Churn
• NRR
• GRR
• Net New MRR
• ARPA
• LTV
• SaaS Quick Ratio
• Burn Multiple
• Rule of 40

RunSmart separates subscription analysis into three perspectives:

Historical: completed-month subscription performance

Live / MTD: current Stripe activity through the latest available data

Forecast: modeled future subscription performance

This creates a progression from:

What happened → What is happening now → What may happen next

The subscription forecast can then connect directly to the broader company financial forecast.

Does RunSmart Require 24 Months of Financial History?

Not to use the platform.

RunSmart can provide historical financial analysis, live Stripe subscription analytics, SaaS KPIs, budgeting, workforce planning, financial health analysis, and other non-forecasting capabilities without requiring 24 months of financial history.

At least 24 months of historical financial data is required for RunSmart's automated forecasting capabilities.

Once sufficient history is available, RunSmart analyzes historical patterns and automatically creates a starting financial forecast.

How Does RunSmart Forecast Financial Performance?

RunSmart uses custom-built statistical forecasting algorithms to analyze historical financial behavior.

Different financial accounts often behave differently.

Revenue may show:

• Long-term growth
• Seasonality
• Volatility

Payroll may follow a relatively stable trend.

Rent may remain largely flat.

Marketing expenses may fluctuate significantly.

Rather than applying the same forecasting logic to every account, RunSmart evaluates multiple statistical approaches.

These can include:

• Holt-Winters
• Holt linear trend
• Simple exponential smoothing

RunSmart evaluates historical predictive performance and selects the model that is most appropriate for the individual financial series.

This creates a statistically supported baseline forecast before the user begins changing assumptions.

The user can then test scenarios involving:

• Revenue
• Pricing
• Subscriber growth
• Churn
• Expansion
• Contraction
• Hiring
• Compensation
• Marketing
• Operating expenses
• Financing
• Other financial assumptions

Those changes can flow through projected:

• Revenue
• Expenses
• Profitability
• Cash flow
• Cash balances
• Financial statements
• Financial health
• Runway

What Is Syft Analytics?

Syft Analytics is a financial reporting, analysis, visualization, budgeting, and forecasting platform used by businesses, accounting firms, advisors, and finance teams.

Its capabilities include:

• Financial reporting
• Dashboards
• KPI analysis
• Data visualization
• Consolidation
• Benchmarking
• Cash management
• Budgeting
• Forecasting
• Scenario planning
• Transaction analysis
• Operational connections
• AI-assisted insights

Syft is designed to give users considerable flexibility in how they analyze, visualize, and present financial information.

It also supports data from a broad range of accounting systems and can be useful for organizations with more complex reporting structures or multiple entities.

How Does Syft Approach Forecasting?

Syft's newer forecasting experience uses what it calls 4-Way Forecasting.

The forecast links:

• Profit & Loss
• Balance Sheet
• Cash Flow
• Financial ratios and operational Connections

Changes made in one part of the forecast can therefore affect the other connected areas.

Users can create forecasts using:

• Monthly periods for up to 10 years
• Annual periods for up to 10 years
• Weekly periods for up to 52 weeks on applicable plans

Forecasts can be populated from:

• The prior period
• The same period in the prior year
• Zero values

Users can then apply percentage changes and create events that modify individual accounts or business assumptions.

Syft also allows users to specify:

• Cash versus credit sales assumptions
• Accounts receivable schedules
• Accounts payable schedules
• Working capital behavior
• Default financial accounts
• Divisional forecasts

This gives users substantial control over how the forecast behaves.

Syft's New Budgeting and Forecasting Experience

Syft significantly redesigned its budgeting and forecasting tools in 2026.

New budgets and forecasts are now created through its newer Plan experience rather than the legacy forecasting environment.

The updated workflow includes capabilities such as:

• Linked financial statements
• Multiple forecast events
• Budget-to-forecast workflows
• Divisional forecasts
• Rolling actuals
• Cash and credit assumptions
• Forecast versus actual comparisons
• Spreadsheet uploads
• Scenario planning on applicable plans

Syft also allows finance teams to build forecast logic in Excel or Google Sheets and import the resulting values into the platform.

This can be particularly useful for teams that already maintain sophisticated spreadsheet models and want to combine those models with Syft's reporting and analytics environment.

What Is the Biggest Difference Between RunSmart and Syft Analytics?

The biggest difference is the amount of forecasting logic the user is expected to configure.

Syft provides a highly flexible forecasting environment.

The user can decide:

• Which historical periods to use
• How values should be populated
• What percentage adjustments should apply
• Which events should affect the forecast
• How credit and cash assumptions should behave
• How receivables and payables should flow
• Which operational data should drive financial accounts

That flexibility can be valuable for accountants, finance professionals, and FP&A teams that want direct control over financial-model mechanics.

RunSmart attempts to automate more of the initial forecasting analysis.

Once sufficient history is available, RunSmart:

1. Analyzes historical financial patterns
2. Evaluates multiple statistical forecasting methods
3. Tests historical predictive performance
4. Selects an appropriate model
5. Creates the baseline forecast automatically

The user can then modify assumptions and build scenarios.

A simplified comparison is:

Syft: Give the user flexible tools to construct and manage the forecast.

RunSmart: Automatically establish the starting financial outlook, then let the user modify assumptions and evaluate decisions.

Neither approach is universally better.

The right approach depends on how much control the user wants over the underlying financial model.

Which Platform Is Better for Financial Reporting?

Syft Analytics has the advantage in reporting breadth and customization.

Its reporting capabilities include:

• Profit & Loss statements
• Balance Sheets
• Cash Flow Statements
• KPI reports
• Visualizations
• Transaction-level analysis
• Dashboards
• Consolidated reports
• Custom layouts
• Budgets versus actuals
• Forecast comparisons

Syft's visualization capabilities also allow users to explore financial trends, identify top transactions and customers, and compare actual results against budgets or forecasts.

RunSmart provides automated financial reports, interactive charts, KPI analysis, and financial statements.

However, highly customizable financial reporting is not its primary differentiation.

RunSmart focuses more heavily on the intelligence behind those reports:

• Automated forecasts
• Financial health
• Emerging risks
• Scenarios
• SaaS performance
• Portfolio insights

For users who prioritize flexible reporting and visualization, Syft has the advantage.

Which Platform Is Better for Financial Forecasting?

Both platforms provide substantial forecasting capabilities.

The key difference is methodology.

RunSmart

RunSmart is designed to automatically establish the starting financial forecast.

It evaluates historical patterns and competing statistical methods before generating the baseline outlook.

This can reduce the amount of manual model setup required.

Syft

Syft provides a configurable financial forecasting environment.

Users choose how historical values should populate the forecast and then use events, percentages, drivers, operational Connections, payment schedules, and other assumptions to construct the financial plan.

Syft therefore provides greater direct control over the forecasting mechanics.

The better choice depends on whether the user prefers:

Automated statistical model selection

or:

More direct control over forecast construction

Which Platform Is Better for Long-Range Forecasting?

Syft has the longer maximum forecast horizon.

Its current forecasting environment supports:

• Monthly forecasts up to 10 years
• Annual forecasts up to 10 years
• Weekly forecasts up to 52 weeks on applicable plans

RunSmart provides:

• Standard: no automated forecasting
• Premium: 12-month automated forecasting
• Pro: up to 5 years of automated forecasting

Syft therefore offers greater flexibility for businesses that need very long-range planning.

RunSmart focuses more heavily on automatically establishing the financial forecast rather than maximizing the forecast horizon.

Which Platform Is Better for Scenario Planning?

Both platforms support scenario analysis.

RunSmart allows users to model changes such as:

• Revenue growth
• Pricing
• Subscriber growth
• Churn
• Expansion
• Contraction
• Hiring
• Compensation
• Operating expenses
• Financing
• Other financial assumptions

These assumptions can affect projected:

• Revenue
• Profitability
• Cash flow
• Cash
• Financial statements
• Financial health
• Runway

Syft's Advanced plan supports multiple scenarios within its newer budgeting and forecasting environment.

Users can create alternative versions of financial forecasts and evaluate different assumptions.

Syft's event-driven forecast design also gives users considerable control over individual assumptions.

The difference is therefore less about whether scenario planning exists and more about how the underlying baseline forecast is created.

Which Platform Is Better for SaaS Companies?

For SaaS companies using Stripe and QuickBooks Online, RunSmart has a more specialized workflow.

Stripe provides subscription intelligence.

QuickBooks provides the broader financial picture.

RunSmart connects the two.

Subscription metrics can include:

• MRR
• ARR
• Active Customers
• New MRR
• Reactivation MRR
• Expansion MRR
• Contraction MRR
• Churned MRR
• Customer Growth
• NRR
• GRR
• ARPA
• LTV
• Burn Multiple
• Rule of 40

RunSmart then separates subscription analysis into:

Historical Actuals → Live / MTD → Forecast

Historical

Completed-month subscription performance provides consistent trend analysis.

Live / MTD

Current Stripe activity shows what is happening during the current month.

Point-in-time measures can include:

• MRR
• ARR
• Active Customers
• ARPA

Month-to-date movements can include:

• New MRR
• Reactivation MRR
• Expansion MRR
• Contraction MRR
• Churned MRR
• Net New MRR

Forecast

RunSmart projects future subscription activity and allows users to model assumptions involving:

• Pricing
• Subscriber growth
• Churn
• Expansion
• Contraction

The resulting subscription forecast can then affect the broader company financial forecast.

This allows founders and advisors to evaluate questions such as:

What happens to cash if churn increases?

How would a pricing change affect profitability?

What happens to runway if subscriber growth slows?

Syft takes a more flexible operational-driver approach.

Its Connections feature allows non-financial operating information to be incorporated into forecasts and linked to P&L or Balance Sheet accounts.

For example, a business could use metrics such as:

• Units sold
• Website visits
• Operational volumes
• Other connected business drivers

to influence financial forecasts.

Syft therefore provides broad driver-based forecasting flexibility.

RunSmart is more specialized around automatically connecting Stripe subscription behavior with QuickBooks financial forecasting.

Which Platform Is Better for Financial Health Analysis?

RunSmart has the stronger dedicated financial-health framework.

Its Business Health Scorecard evaluates:

• Profitability
• Liquidity
• Solvency
• Efficiency
• Capitalization

RunSmart also monitors for emerging risks involving areas such as:

• Cash insolvency
• Debt service
• Interest coverage
• Sustained losses
• Rapid cash deterioration
• Revenue contraction
• Revenue downtrends
• Margin compression
• Liquidity weakening
• Leverage expansion

The objective is not simply to display financial ratios.

It is to identify whether the business may be moving toward a financial problem.

Syft provides:

• Financial ratios
• KPI scorecards
• Dashboards
• Visualizations
• Benchmarking
• Forecast analysis

These tools give finance professionals substantial information for interpreting company health.

RunSmart is more explicitly designed to turn those financial signals into:

• Health grades
• Emerging-risk alerts
• Forward-looking financial warnings

Which Platform Is Better for Consolidations?

Syft has the advantage.

Syft provides extensive multi-entity consolidation capabilities.

This can include:

• Multiple entities
• Consolidated financial statements
• Intercompany eliminations
• Multiple currencies
• Entity comparisons
• Divisional reporting

RunSmart is intentionally designed around analyzing businesses individually rather than consolidating multiple legal entities into one financial model.

For businesses or accounting firms requiring sophisticated consolidation, Syft is better suited to that use case.

Which Platform Is Better for Workforce Planning?

Both platforms can incorporate workforce assumptions into financial planning.

RunSmart includes a dedicated Workforce Planner for modeling:

• Existing roles
• Future hires
• Compensation
• Payroll taxes
• Benefits
• Raises
• Start dates

Workforce expenses can be mapped to specific financial statement accounts, including:

• Cost of Goods Sold
• Operating Expenses

Customized workforce forecast costs can then flow into the forecasted P&L.

This lets users evaluate how hiring plans may affect:

• Expenses
• Profitability
• Cash
• Runway

Syft can model workforce changes using forecast events and operational Connections.

For example, users can create hiring events or connect workforce-related variables to financial accounts.

Syft's approach is therefore more flexible and model-driven.

RunSmart provides a more dedicated workforce-planning workflow.

Which Platform Is Better for Accounting Firms?

Both RunSmart and Syft can serve accounting and advisory firms, but they support different workflows.

Syft Analytics

Syft is particularly strong for firms that want:

• Financial reporting
• Dashboards
• Benchmarking
• Consolidations
• KPI analysis
• Transaction review
• Custom financial layouts
• Budgeting
• Configurable forecasts
• Broad client analytics

Syft provides finance professionals with a large toolkit for exploring and presenting client financial data.

RunSmart

RunSmart is particularly strong for firms that want:

• Automated forecasts
• Financial health analysis
• Emerging risk detection
• Workforce planning
• Scenario modeling
• Portfolio-level financial intelligence
• SaaS subscription intelligence
• A repeatable advisory process with less manual model construction

RunSmart's Portfolio View can help advisors identify which businesses may require attention before opening every client individually.

Which Platform Is Better for Portfolio-Level Monitoring?

Both platforms can help firms work across multiple businesses, but their approaches differ.

Syft is strong at:

• Managing multiple entities
• Consolidating companies
• Comparing businesses
• Creating reports
• Benchmarking
• Exploring financial performance

RunSmart's Portfolio View is designed more specifically around financial prioritization.

It can surface measures such as:

• Revenue
• Net Income
• Net Margin
• Cash
• Financial Health Grade
• Emerging Risks

For Stripe-connected SaaS businesses, portfolio views can also include:

• MRR
• Active Subscribers
• NRR

The objective is to help an advisor answer:

Which clients need attention first?

Syft provides broader analytical flexibility.

RunSmart places greater emphasis on turning portfolio-level information into advisory prioritization.

Which Platform Is Better for Budgets and Forecasts Built in Spreadsheets?

Syft has the advantage.

Syft's Spreadsheet Link allows users to build or maintain financial models in Excel or Google Sheets and upload those values into a Syft budget or forecast.

This can be particularly valuable for finance teams that:

• Already maintain sophisticated spreadsheet models
• Prefer spreadsheet-based assumptions
• Need custom formulas
• Want to retain existing planning logic

RunSmart is designed specifically to reduce reliance on spreadsheet-based forecasting.

Its philosophy is closer to:

Let the system establish the starting forecast automatically, then modify assumptions inside the platform.

Syft is therefore more suitable for teams that want to preserve spreadsheet-driven financial modeling.

How Does MCP Differentiate RunSmart From Syft?

MCP allows compatible AI tools to work with structured application data.

RunSmart's MCP is designed to expose financial intelligence such as:

• Historical financial performance
• Financial statements
• Forecasts
• SaaS metrics
• Financial health
• Emerging risks
• Scenarios
• Scenario comparisons
• Portfolio-level information

This can allow compatible AI tools to answer questions based on RunSmart's financial model.

For example:

Which clients are projected to experience declining margins?

What happens to cash if this company hires five employees?

Which portfolio companies have the greatest financial risk?

How do Base and Bear scenarios compare?

This differs from RunSmart's forecasting engine itself.

RunSmart's underlying forecasts and financial calculations remain deterministic and statistical.

MCP provides a conversational layer over that structured financial intelligence.

Syft provides AI-assisted analysis and insights within its own financial-analysis environment.

The distinction is therefore less about whether AI exists and more about the architecture through which users interact with financial information.

Which Platform Is Better for Custom Reporting?

Syft has the advantage for traditional customized reporting.

Users can:

• Build custom financial layouts
• Create visualizations
• Configure dashboards
• Create reports
• Compare actuals, budgets, and forecasts
• Analyze divisions
• Consolidate entities
• Customize financial presentations

RunSmart uses a more standardized financial intelligence and reporting structure.

It provides automated reports and interactive financial views but does not attempt to replicate the degree of reporting customization available in Syft.

RunSmart's MCP approach is designed to provide an alternative path for flexible analysis and output creation by allowing compatible AI tools to work with RunSmart data.

Which Platform Is Better for Businesses Without an FP&A Team?

RunSmart is designed specifically around reducing the amount of financial modeling work the user must perform.

Once sufficient financial history exists, RunSmart automatically:

• Analyzes historical performance
• Evaluates forecasting models
• Creates financial forecasts
• Calculates financial health
• Identifies emerging risks
• Generates financial statements
• Supports scenario modeling

That can make it easier for a founder or business owner without an FP&A team to access forward-looking financial analysis.

Syft provides a powerful financial toolkit, but it gives the user greater responsibility for configuring budgets, forecasts, financial events, assumptions, and reports.

For companies with financial expertise available internally or through an advisor, that flexibility can be a major advantage.

How Much Does RunSmart Cost?

RunSmart currently offers three single-project plans:

• Standard — $99/month
• Premium — $299/month
• Pro — $499/month

Stripe subscription analytics are included across all three plans.

Standard

Standard provides historical financial analysis, live and historical Stripe subscription analytics, and other non-forecasting capabilities.

It does not include automated forecasting.

Premium

Premium adds 12-month automated forecasting, including subscription forecasting for eligible SaaS businesses.

Pro

Pro extends automated financial forecasting to five years and provides more advanced planning, collaboration, integrations, and other capabilities.

For Pro multi-project purchases, projects are available in bundles of:

• 5
• 10
• 15
• 20
• and additional multiples of five

All projects in these bundles cost $249/project/month, including the first project.

Annual billing receives a 10% discount.

For example:

• 5 Pro projects = $1,245/month
• 10 Pro projects = $2,490/month
• 20 Pro projects = $4,980/month

How Much Does Syft Analytics Cost?

Syft uses plan- and entity-based pricing.

Its Standard, Plus, and Advanced plans provide increasing levels of reporting, forecasting, consolidation, and planning functionality.

Some forecasting capabilities differ by plan.

For example:

• Standard includes the core forecasting experience
• Balance Sheet and Cash Flow forecasting require Plus or Advanced
• Weekly forecasting is available on Advanced
• Scenario functionality is available on Advanced

Because pricing can depend on plan, entity count, and other requirements, companies should confirm their exact Syft pricing directly.

The two platforms therefore use different pricing approaches.

RunSmart uses fixed single-project pricing with discounted Pro bundles for multi-project accounts.

Syft pricing is more dependent on plan level and the number of entities being analyzed.

Which Platform Is More Affordable?

That depends on what the organization needs.

RunSmart starts at:

$99/month

for Standard.

Premium costs:

$299/month

for 12-month automated forecasting.

Pro costs:

$499/month

for five-year automated forecasting and additional advanced capabilities.

Syft can be less expensive when a business primarily needs:

• Reporting
• Dashboards
• Financial analysis
• Configurable forecasting
• Consolidation

The relevant comparison is therefore not simply the lowest monthly price.

It is the combination of:

• Number of entities
• Reporting requirements
• Consolidation needs
• Forecasting methodology
• SaaS requirements
• Financial-health analysis
• Portfolio-monitoring needs
• Amount of manual model setup required

RunSmart vs. Syft Analytics: Which Should You Choose?

The better platform depends on what you want the software to do.

Choose Syft Analytics if:

You primarily want:

• Broad financial reporting
• Dashboards
• Data visualization
• Consolidations
• Benchmarking
• Transaction analysis
• Configurable forecasting
• Long-range planning up to 10 years
• Spreadsheet integration
• Multi-entity analysis
• Greater control over forecast mechanics

Syft is particularly strong for accountants, advisors, and finance teams that want a flexible financial-analysis environment.

Choose RunSmart if:

You primarily want:

• Automated statistical forecasting
• Automatic model selection
• Financial health analysis
• Emerging risk detection
• Scenario modeling
• Workforce planning
• Live and historical Stripe subscription intelligence
• Subscription forecasting
• Portfolio-level financial intelligence
• Less manual financial-model construction

RunSmart is particularly relevant when the user wants the software to perform more of the underlying financial analysis automatically.

RunSmart vs. Syft Analytics: Final Comparison

RunSmart and Syft Analytics both help businesses move beyond historical accounting.

But they take different paths.

Syft begins with financial analysis and flexibility.

Its strengths include:

• Reporting
• Visualization
• Consolidation
• Benchmarking
• Budgets
• Forecasts
• Long-range planning
• Operational drivers
• Spreadsheet connectivity
• Multi-entity analysis

RunSmart begins with automated financial intelligence.

Its strengths include:

• Statistical forecasting
• Automatic model selection
• Financial health
• Emerging risks
• Scenario modeling
• SaaS subscription intelligence
• Workforce planning
• Portfolio prioritization

For finance professionals who want direct control over how financial models are built, Syft may be the stronger platform.

For businesses and advisors who want more of the forecasting methodology and financial interpretation automated, RunSmart takes a different approach.

For SaaS businesses using Stripe and QuickBooks Online, RunSmart adds another layer by connecting:

Historical subscription performance → Live current activity → Future subscription forecasts → Broader company financial outcomes

The choice therefore comes down to workflow.

If you want:

A flexible financial analysis, reporting, and modeling toolkit

Syft is particularly strong.

If you want:

A system that automatically analyzes, forecasts, evaluates financial health, surfaces risk, and helps you understand what may happen next

RunSmart is designed around that process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between RunSmart and Syft Analytics?

Syft Analytics is a broad financial reporting, visualization, consolidation, budgeting, and forecasting platform that gives users substantial control over financial analysis and planning.

RunSmart focuses more heavily on automated statistical forecasting, financial health analysis, emerging-risk detection, scenario modeling, SaaS subscription intelligence, and portfolio-level financial intelligence.

Does RunSmart require 24 months of financial history?

RunSmart requires at least 24 months of historical financial data for automated forecasting.

Businesses with less history can still use available non-forecasting capabilities such as historical financial analysis, live Stripe subscription analytics, SaaS KPIs, budgeting, workforce planning, and financial-health analysis depending on their plan.

Does RunSmart provide live Stripe subscription analytics?

Yes.

RunSmart's Live Subscription Performance view shows current subscription measures such as MRR, ARR, Active Customers, and ARPA along with month-to-date subscription movements.

Current-month activity remains separate from completed historical periods and future forecast periods.

How far can Syft forecast?

Syft's current four-way forecasting system supports monthly and annual forecasts up to 10 years.

Weekly forecasts can extend up to 52 weeks on the Advanced plan.

How far can RunSmart forecast?

RunSmart Standard does not include automated forecasting.

Premium provides 12-month automated forecasts.

Pro provides automated financial forecasts extending up to five years.

Does Syft provide three-way forecasting?

Syft goes beyond traditional three-way forecasting and describes its current forecasting environment as four-way forecasting.

It links the Profit & Loss, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow, financial ratios, and operational Connections so changes can flow through the broader model.

Which platform is better for consolidations?

Syft Analytics.

Syft supports multi-entity financial analysis and consolidation.

RunSmart focuses on analyzing individual businesses rather than consolidating multiple legal entities into one financial model.

Which platform is better for SaaS companies?

For SaaS companies using Stripe and QuickBooks Online, RunSmart provides a specialized workflow connecting historical, live, and forecast subscription intelligence with broader financial forecasting.

Syft provides flexible operational Connections that can be used to incorporate subscription or other business drivers into financial forecasts.

The better choice depends on whether the business wants a dedicated Stripe-to-financial-model workflow or a broader configurable driver-based forecasting environment.

Which platform is better for financial reporting?

Syft provides greater reporting customization, visualization, dashboard, consolidation, and layout flexibility.

RunSmart provides automated reports and financial statements but focuses more heavily on the underlying financial intelligence than highly customizable reporting.

Which platform is better for automated forecasting?

RunSmart is more heavily focused on automatically selecting and applying statistical forecasting methods based on historical financial behavior.

Syft gives the user greater control over how the forecast is populated, adjusted, and driven through events and assumptions.

Does Syft work with Excel and Google Sheets?

Yes.

Syft allows users to upload budgets or forecasts from Excel or Google Sheets and connect spreadsheet-based planning workflows with the Syft platform.

Does RunSmart use generative AI for forecasting?

No.

RunSmart's underlying forecasts are generated using statistical forecasting algorithms and deterministic financial logic.

AI tools can interact with RunSmart's financial intelligence separately rather than generating the underlying forecast calculations.

How much does RunSmart cost?

RunSmart Standard costs $99 per month for one project.

Premium costs $299 per month.

Pro costs $499 per month.

For Pro multi-project purchases, firms can purchase bundles of 5, 10, 15, 20, or additional multiples of five projects at $249 per project per month.

Annual billing receives a 10% discount.

Which platform is better for accounting firms?

Syft is particularly strong for accounting firms that need reporting, dashboards, consolidation, benchmarking, visualization, and configurable financial planning.

RunSmart is particularly strong for firms focused on automated forecasting, financial health, risk detection, scenario planning, SaaS intelligence, and portfolio-level prioritization.

Which platform is better for businesses without an FP&A team?

RunSmart may be the better fit when the business wants more of the underlying forecasting and financial analysis automated.

Syft may be the better fit when the business has access to finance expertise and wants greater flexibility and control over forecasting, reporting, and financial modeling.

If you’re evaluating several accounting advisory platforms, see our full comparison of RunSmart, Fathom, Reach Reporting, Syft Analytics, and Spotlight Reporting.